Urology Research & Practice
Original Article

Comparison of outcomes of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study

1.

Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Pakistan Kidney Institute, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

2.

Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

Urol Res Pract 2018; 44: 56-61
DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.19616
Read: 1792 Downloads: 968 Published: 25 July 2019

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and tubed PCNL by using small bore nephrostomy tube (12Fr) in children for the management of nephrolithiasis.

 

Material and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 35 children where tubed PCNL (Group 1) was done in 18, and tubeless PCNL (group 2) in 17 patients from January 2010 to December 2016. Charts were reviewed for age, mass, stone size, operative time, hospital stay and stone-free rates.These variables were compared between the two groups. SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis. The data were shown as mean±standard deviation for continuous variables.Categorical variables were presented in percentages.

 

Results: There is no difference in terms of age, stone sizes, operative times, hospital stays, stone-free rates and post-PCNL complications between the two groups (p>0.05). The mean drop in hemoglobin level was 0.7±0.1 g/dL and 1.3±0.2 g/dL in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.01). 

 

Conclusion: Tubeless PCNL in children is a safe option in well selected cases.

 

 

Cite this article as: Iqbal N, Assad S, Hussain I, Hassan Y, Khan H, Armaghan M, et al. Comparison of outcome of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study. Turk J Urol 2018; 44(1): 56-61.

Files
EISSN 2980-1478