Abstract
Introduction: Bladder cancer is the second most frequent cancer of the genitourinary system. Radical
cystectomy maintains its position as the gold standard in the treatment of local invasive bladder cancer. The
ileal loop introduced by Seiffert and popularized by Bricker has been used for half a century, and it is still
considered a standard form of urinary diversion following cystectomy for bladder cancer. The purpose of this
study was to evaluate the long-term follow-up results of patients in whom radical cystectomy and ileal loop had
been performed within the last 10 years in our clinic because of local invasive bladder tumors, and to compare
two anastomosis techniques used in ureteroileal anastomoses.
Materials and Methods: Follow-up data of 74 patients in whom radical cystectomy and ileal loop had been
performed in our clinic between 1994 and 2004 were retrospectively examined. Complications seen within the
postoperative 30 days were recorded as early complications, and complications seen in later periods were
recorded as late complications. Early and late postoperative complication rates for the entire patient groups
were determined. Group 1 included 60 patients in whom Bricker technique had been applied as the
ureteroileal anastomosis technique and Group 2 included 14 patients in whom Wallace technique had been
applied. These two groups were compared in terms of age, mean follow-up period, pathological stages, and
ureteral complications as stricture and leakage in anastomosis.
Results: The mean age of patients was 60.7±9.68 years (28-80), and average follow-up period was
17.6±19.11 months (1-96). Pathologically, 70 of the patients (94.6%) had transitional-cell cancer, 3 (4%) had
adenocancer, and 1 (1.4%) had squamous-cell cancer. In six patients out of 74 (8.8%) prostate adenocancer
was determined incidentally. During follow-up 14 of the patients were lost. While early complications were
seen in 17.5% of the patients, the most frequent early complication was evisceration (12.2%). Late
complications were seen in 32.4% of the patients. The most frequent complications in late period were
hydronephrosis and ureteral anastomosis stricture (10.8%). Two groups with Bricker and Wallace type
ureteroileal anastomosis were similar in terms of age, gender, and the distribution of pathological stages.
Anastomosis stricture was seen in 8 patients and urine leakage from the anastomosis in 2 out of 60 patients in
the Bricker technique group. Anastomosis stricture and urine leakage were observed in none of the patients in
Group 2.
Conclusion: Wallace technique can be preferred as the ureteroileal anastomosis method in ileal loop
diversion after radical cystectomy, since it has lower complication rates when compared to Bricker technique.