Urology Research & Practice
Urooncology

PRE/POST MEAL PSA VALUES: SHOULD IT BE MEASURED IN PRE-MEAL BLOOD SERUM?

1.

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, MANİSA

2.

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, MANİSA

Urol Res Pract 2005; 31: 36-40
Read: 1384 Downloads: 1067 Published: 25 July 2019

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the commonly used tumor marker in the early diagnosis of

prostate cancer. Although it is highly specific for prostate, its specifity is low for prostate cancer. Since it is

affected by many factors other than cancer such as diurnal variations of the secretion, existing of infections or

inflammations in the prostatic tissue, volume of prostate, digital rectal examination, ejaculation or rectal

manipulations and surgery of the prostate, the value of serum PSA level is limited.

Serum insulin level increases and reaches maximum level at first hour due to increased glucose level after

meal. Thereafter the level of serum insulin values return to its normal level at approximately two hours after

meal. On the other hand, insulin suppresses the production of sex hormone binding protein in liver cells.

Therefore, it is logic to investigate PSA levels due to metabolic and hormonal changes after meal. We

investigated changes of PSA level after meal in this prospective study.

 

Materials and Methods: Thirty-three healthy cases were included in this study to determine changes of

serum PSA levels pre and post-meal manner. All patients were given same regular diet comprised of 700

calories (50-55% carbohydrates, 25-30% lipids and 20% proteins). Blood samples were taken an hour before

meal (PSA-0), and one (PSA-1) and two (PSA-2) hours after meal. Serum PSA levels were determined by

chemiluminescence method. Paired sample t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for statistical

analysis.

 

Results: The mean age of the patients was 42±17.5 (Range 20-80) years. The mean PSA level at one hour

before meal, one and two hours after meal were 0.70±0.69 ngr/ml (PSA-0), 0.74±0.75 ngr/ml (PSA-1) and

0.65±0.57 ngr/ml, (PSA-2) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between serum PSA-0

levels with PSA-1 (p=0.106) and PSA-2 (p=0.109) levels. However, there was a statistically significant

difference between first hour and second hour after meal mean PSA levels (p=0.029).

 

Conclusion: Serum PSA values may be affected not only from prostatic disturbances, but also the changes

of its metabolism and levels of PSA binding proteins.

Insulin, proinsulin, C-peptid and Zn secretion increase after meal. In contrast, glukagon, cortisol,

epinephrin, norepinephrin secretion decrease. These differences could also change the levels of detectable

fractions of PSA temprorarily and may affect serum total PSA levels. The differences of serum PSA levels

represent paralelism with the changes in serum insulin levels after meal.

In this study, mean PSA levels increased at first hour after meal and decreased at second hour after meal.

These differences in PSA levels could affect the decision making for indication of prostate biopsy in patients

with borderline PSA levels and it should be considered when the serum samples are taken whether patients are

hungry or not.

The determination of ideal serum PSA sampling time would be important in order to prevent false

negative or positive serum PSA results. In this way, clinicians would decide not to do invasive procedures

especially in patients with borderline serum PSA levels.

Files
EISSN 2980-1478