Other

THE EFFICIENCY OF INTRARECTAL LIDOCAINE GEL FOR PAIN CONTROL DURING TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY

Volume 29 · Issue 4 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
Altuğ Tuncel
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Yılmaz Aslan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Hakan Aksüt
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Osman Özergin
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Ümit Y. Tekdoğan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Ali Atan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: We prospectively evaluated the efficacy of intrarectal lidocaine gel as local anesthesia during transrectal prostate needle biopsy.

Material and Methods: Between July 2002-March 2003, 84 patients were involved the study who underwent transrectal prostate needle biopsy due to abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination and/or elevated serum prostate specific antigen. Patients were randomized into two groups. 41 patients who received 20 cc of 2% intrarectal lidocaine (Xylocain®) 10 minutes before the biopsy as group 1 and 43 patients who received 20 cc of intrarectal lumbricant gel which had no contain lidocaine 10 minutes before the biopsy as group 2. The pain level during the biopsy was compared with pain level during intramuscular injection for preventing antibiotic medication one hour before the biopsy.

Results: In groups 1 and 2 median patient age was 67.8±1.3 year and 67.4±1.2 year (p=0.875), and median prostate specific antigen was 26.8 ±7.2 ng/ml and 14.8±3.05 ng/ml (p=0.393). In groups 1 and 2; of 7.3% and 43.2% the patients had more pain level during the biopsy than in the intramuscular injection respectively (p=0.001).

Conclusion: Intrarectal lidocaine gel is a cost effective, easy applicable, non invasive and efficacious procedure of providing anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal prostate needle biopsy. We believe that its routine administration is necessary due to increase of patient’s comfort.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research & Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 29 · Issue 4
Pages 403-406
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Altuğ Tuncel
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Yılmaz Aslan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Hakan Aksüt
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Osman Özergin
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Ümit Y. Tekdoğan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Ali Atan
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Üroloji Kliniği, ANKARA
Cite this Article
Outlines