Other

USE OF INTRARECTAL LIDOCAINE GEL DURING TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY ON PATIENT’S TOLERANCE

Volume 29 · Issue 4 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
Mesut Gürdal
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Sinan Kireççi
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Ali TEKİN
Haydarpaşa Numune Hastanesi 1. Üroloji Kliniği, İSTANBUL
E. Veli Küçük
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Aydın Gürbüz
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Radyoloji Kliniği, İSTANBUL
M. İhsan KARAMAN
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Gürdal, M., Kireççi, S., TEKİN, A., Küçük, E. V., Gürbüz, A., & KARAMAN, M. İhsan. (2019). USE OF INTRARECTAL LIDOCAINE GEL DURING TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY ON PATIENT’S TOLERANCE. Urology Research and Practice, 29(4), 407–409. Retrieved from https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1909
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: In our study we evaluated the effect of intrarectal lidocaine gel versus gel without lidocaine in prostate biopsy on the patient tolerance.

Materials and Methods: 65 patients, with an average age of 67 (51-83) years who were advised to undergo TRUS guided prostate biopsy between January and June 2002 in our clinic, were included in our study. Randomize two groups were formed as group A (33), group B (32). Classical six quadrant biopsy was performed 10 minutes after the application of rectal 2% lidocaine gel in group A and normal gel without lidocaine in group B. Patients who needed more than 6 quadrant biopsy were excluded from the study. Following the procedure patients were taken to another room where their tolerance was evaluated by the doctors who did not performed the biopsy. Visual analog scala (VAS) was utilized to evaluate the tolerance; rating from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unendurable). Results were statistically evaluated.

Results: Similar rates were observed with VAS evaluation of the patients in two groups. The mean pain score was 2.9±2.0 VAS in lidocaine group, 3.0±2.1 VAS in the ultrasonic gel. This difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test p=0.811).

Conclusion: We found out that, use of intrarectal lidocaine gel, which is believed to be convenient anesthethi technique in sustaining both patient and doctors comfort while performing TRUS guided prostate biopsy, does not significantly effect the pain tolerance. For this reason alternative techniques should be preferred.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 29 · Issue 4
Pages 407-409
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Mesut Gürdal
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Sinan Kireççi
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Ali TEKİN
Haydarpaşa Numune Hastanesi 1. Üroloji Kliniği, İSTANBUL
E. Veli Küçük
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Aydın Gürbüz
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Radyoloji Kliniği, İSTANBUL
M. İhsan KARAMAN
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul
Cite this Article
Gürdal, M., Kireççi, S., TEKİN, A., Küçük, E. V., Gürbüz, A., & KARAMAN, M. İhsan. (2019). USE OF INTRARECTAL LIDOCAINE GEL DURING TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY ON PATIENT’S TOLERANCE. Urology Research and Practice, 29(4), 407–409. Retrieved from https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1909
Outlines