Original Article

Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm

Volume 41 · Issue 2 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
DOI
Cihat Tektaş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Şehmus Erdem Özkarataş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
İrfan Orhan
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Orhan Karakoç
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Ahmet Karakeçi
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Tunç Ozan
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Fatih Fırdolaş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm and to compare its results with those of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 143 patients: 86 patients (53 males and 33 females) who underwent PCNL and 57 patients (37 males and 20 females) who underwent RIRS between October 2009 and October 2013.

Results: The mean duration of operation was 100.26±33.26 min in the RIRS group and 75.55±21.5 min in the PCNL group (p<0.001). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RIRS group (1.56±0.8 vs. 4.57±2.1 days in the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively; p<0.001). Stone-free rates after one session were 66.6% and 91.8% of the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively. The stone-free rate of the RIRS group improved to 87.7% after the second session. Blood transfusions were required in two patients in the PCNL group. Complication rates were higher in the PCNL group.

Conclusion: This study revealed that RIRS can be an alternative to PCNL in the treatment of kidney stones with a diameter of 2–4 cm especially in patients with comorbidities.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research & Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 41 · Issue 2
Pages 73-77
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Cihat Tektaş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Şehmus Erdem Özkarataş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
İrfan Orhan
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Orhan Karakoç
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Ahmet Karakeçi
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Tunç Ozan
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Fatih Fırdolaş
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey
Cite this Article
Outlines