Original Article

Is it safe to prescribe ascorbic acid for urinary acidification in stone-forming patients with alkaline urine?

Volume 43 · Issue 2 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
DOI
Alexandrine da Silva
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Nader Fahmy
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sero Andonian
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Yasser A. Noureldin
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Urology, Benha University Hospital, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
Silva, A. da, Fahmy, N., Andonian, S., & Noureldin, Y. A. (2019). Is it safe to prescribe ascorbic acid for urinary acidification in stone-forming patients with alkaline urine?. Urology Research and Practice, 43(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.02700
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of ascorbic acid (AA) supplementation on urinary pH, metabolic stone work-up parameters, and development of de novo urolithiasis in stone-forming patients.

Material and methods: A retrospective review of the patients followed-up at a tertiary stone centre between September 2009 and October 2015 was performed. Patients with recurrent urolithiasis who received AA supplementation as a urinary acidifying agent were included in the study. Detailed metabolic stone work-up, including two 24-hour urine collections obtained pre- and post-AA supplementation were compared. In addition, imaging studies were reviewed to assess the development of de novo urolithiasis.

Results: Twenty-four patients were included in the study with a mean age of 60.6 years and a median daily AA dose of 1000 mg (range: 500-2000 mg). Median follow-up period was 22.6 months (range: 19.7-32.1). After AA supplementation, there was a significant decrease in urinary pH (7.6 vs. 6.9, p=0.02). Although there was no significant increase in the daily oxalate excretion, two patients (8.3%) had their AA dose reduced or discontinued due to de novo hyperoxaluria (342.9 vs 510.2 umol/day; p=0.75). Other serum and urinary parameters did not show any significant changes. Eight (33.3%) patients developed de novo urolithiasis with struvite and carbonate apatite being the major components.

Conclusion: AA supplementation resulted in significantly lower urinary pH in patients with recurrent urolithiasis and alkaline urine pH. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether this reduction in urinary pH is associated with lower stone recurrence rates.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 43 · Issue 2
Pages 183-188
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Alexandrine da Silva
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Nader Fahmy
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sero Andonian
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Yasser A. Noureldin
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Urology, Benha University Hospital, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
Cite this Article
Silva, A. da, Fahmy, N., Andonian, S., & Noureldin, Y. A. (2019). Is it safe to prescribe ascorbic acid for urinary acidification in stone-forming patients with alkaline urine?. Urology Research and Practice, 43(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.02700
Outlines