Original Article

Safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stone: A prosective randomized trial

Volume 43 · Issue 4 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
DOI
Rohit Bhattar
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Vipin Jain
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Vinay Tomar
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Sher Singh Yadav
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Bhattar, R., Jain, V., Tomar, V., & Yadav, S. S. (2019). Safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stone: A prosective randomized trial. Urology Research and Practice, 43(4), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.83548
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large size ureteroscope (8/9.8 Fr) in the management of ureteral stone.

 

Material and methods: Between June 2015 and May 2016, 86 patients presented with ureteral stone of size 6-15 mm were on consent randomly assigned to 1 of 3 outpatient treatment arms: silodosin (Group A), tadalafil (Group B), and placebo (Group C). After two weeks of therapy 67 patients underwent ureteroscopy, and ureteral orifice configuration, ureteroscopic negotiation, ureteral dilatation, operating time, procedural complication and drug related side effects were noted in each group.

 

Results: Ureteral negotiation was significantly better in Groups A (73.9%) and B (69.6%) as compared to Group C (38.1%) (p<0.01). Statistically significant difference was noted in the requirement for dilatation in Group C (71.4%) as compared to Groups A (26.1%) and B (39.1%) (p<0.01). Ureteral orifice was found to be more dilated in Groups A (69.6%) and B (60.9%) as compared to Group C (28.6%). Mean operating time was statistically lower in Groups A (35.2 min) and B (34.91 min) as compared to Group C (41.14 min) (p<0.01).

 

 

Conclusion: Both silodosin and tadalafil not only relax ureteral smooth muscle but also help in forward propagation of large size ureteroscope (8/9.8 Fr) without any significant risk of adverse events. 

 

 

Cite this article as: Bhattar R, Jain V, Tomar V, Yadav SS. Safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large ureteroscope in management of ureteral stone: A prosective randomized trial. Turk J Urol 2017; 43(4): 484-9.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 43 · Issue 4
Pages 484-489
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Rohit Bhattar
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Vipin Jain
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Vinay Tomar
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Sher Singh Yadav
Department of Urology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Cite this Article
Bhattar, R., Jain, V., Tomar, V., & Yadav, S. S. (2019). Safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stone: A prosective randomized trial. Urology Research and Practice, 43(4), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.83548
Outlines