Original Article

Outcomes of second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal calculi-a single centre experience

Volume 44 · Issue 5 Publish Date: July 25, 2019
Full Text PDF
DOI
Sumit Kumar
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Ashwin Mallya
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Ramaiah Keshavamurthy
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Kumar, S., Karthikeyan, V. S., Mallya, A., & Keshavamurthy, R. (2019). Outcomes of second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal calculi-a single centre experience. Urology Research and Practice, 44(5), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.76299
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) carries significant potential for morbidity. Scant data exists on indications and outcomes of second-look PCNL after a failure to completely clear renal stones at the first attempt. We present our experience with second-look PCNL.


Material and methods
: This was a retrospective record review of 922 patients who underwent unilateral PCNL at a tertiary care center in South India. Baseline patient, stone characteristics and outcomes were compared between 844 patients undergoing primary PCNL and 78 patients requiring second-look PCNL.


Results
: Increased stone complexity in terms of Guy stone score (GSS), stone size, staghorn calculi and stones in multiple locations were significantly associated with primary treatment failure (p<0.001). Operative time >75 min had a significant association with need for second-look PCNL and complications. Initial PCNL was discontinued due to bleeding (28; 35.9%), pelvicalyceal system perforation (3; 3.9%) and purulent urine leading to urosepsis and hemodynamic instability (2; 2.6%). Staged PCNL was done in 44 (56.3%) patients. During second-look PCNL, new access tracts were necessary in majority (42; 53.9%) of the patients and multiple tracts in 20 (25.6%) patients. In second-look PCNL, complications were comparable to primary PCNL (p=0.289).


Conclusion
: Second-look PCNL should be advocated in patients where the initial PCNL was discontinued due to bleeding, perforation of collecting system, prolonged operative time (>75 min) and in patients with large stone burden.


Cite this article as
: Kumar S, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A, Keshavamurthy R. Outcomes of second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal calculi-a single centre experience. Turk J Urol 2018; 44(5): 406-10.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 44 · Issue 5
Pages 406-410
History
Published Online July 25, 2019
Copyright
Affiliations
Sumit Kumar
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Ashwin Mallya
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Ramaiah Keshavamurthy
Institute of Nephro Urology, Bangalore, India
Cite this Article
Kumar, S., Karthikeyan, V. S., Mallya, A., & Keshavamurthy, R. (2019). Outcomes of second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal calculi-a single centre experience. Urology Research and Practice, 44(5), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.76299
Outlines