UROONCOLOGY - Original Article

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy

Volume 46 · Issue 2 Publish Date: January 20, 2020
Full Text PDF
DOI
Nigel P. Murray
Servicio de Medicina, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Cynthia Fuentealba
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Aníbal Salazar
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Eduardo Reyes
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital DIPRECA, Vital Apoquindo 1200, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Murray, N. P., Fuentealba, C., Salazar, A., & Reyes, E. (2020). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Urology Research and Practice, 46(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: It has been reported that the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are higher in men with prostate cancer. We compare their use with the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and primary circulating prostate cells (CPCs) to predict clinically significant prostate cancer at first biopsy in men with a PSA of 4–10 ng/mL.

Material and methods: Consecutive men with suspicion of prostate cancer underwent a 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy; total serum PSA, the percentage of free PSA, prostate ultrasound to calculate PSA density, and absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts were used for risk assessment. CPCs were detected using differential gel centrifugation and immunocytochemistry with anti-PSA and anti-P504S. A malignant CPC was defined as a cell-expressing PSA and P504S and defined as positive or negative. Biopsies were classified as indicating cancer or no cancer. Areas under the curve for each parameter were calculated and compared, and diagnostic yields were calculated.

Results: A total of 1223 men participated, and 467 (38%) had a biopsy positive for cancer, whereas 353/467 (76%) had clinically significant prostate cancer. The PLR was significantly higher in men with prostate cancer; there was no significant difference for the SII. The areas under the curves were CPC 0.84, the percentage of free PSA was 0.79, PLR 0.65, PSA density 0.62, and SII 0.46. Neither the PLR nor the SII discriminated between patients with clinically significant prostate cancer, indolent cancer, and benign prostatic disease.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, neither the SII nor PLR could differentiate between clinically significant prostate cancer and indolent cancer/benign disease at initial biopsy.

Cite this article as: Murray NP, Fuentealba C, Salazar A, Reyes E. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turk J Urol 2020; 46(2): 115-22.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 46 · Issue 2
Pages 115-122
History
Published Online January 20, 2020
Copyright
Affiliations
Nigel P. Murray
Servicio de Medicina, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Cynthia Fuentealba
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Aníbal Salazar
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital de Carabineros de Chile, Simón Bolívar 2200, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile
Eduardo Reyes
Servicio de Urologia, Hospital DIPRECA, Vital Apoquindo 1200, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Cite this Article
Murray, N. P., Fuentealba, C., Salazar, A., & Reyes, E. (2020). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Urology Research and Practice, 46(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Outlines