ENDOUROLOGY - Invited Review

Robot-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Current status and review of the literature

Volume 46 · Issue 5 Publish Date: August 31, 2020
Full Text PDF
DOI
Ali Serdar Gözen
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Theodoros Tokas
Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T.,Hall in Tirol, Austria
Ahmed Tawfick
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Waleed Mousa
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Mohamed Kotb
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Eirini Tzanaki
University of Pavia, Medical School, Harvey Course, Pavia, Italy
Jens Rassweiler
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Microscope-assisted vasovasostomy (MAVV) is a standard procedure used to reverse vasectomies. Robotic surgery has been established primarily for technically demanding urological procedures and has also been recently implemented in male reproductive surgery. We aimed to review the current evidence of robot-assisted vasovasostomy (RAVV) and robot-assisted vasoepididymostomy (RAVE).

Material and methods: We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed to identify relevant original articles. We identified 2017 records through database search, and after removing duplicates, 782 records remained for further analysis.

Results: In total, 12 human and three animal studies were selected. Reported vasal patency rate ranges were 88%–100% for RAVVs and 55%–61% for RAVEs. The sperm count and postoperative pregnancy rates of RAVV ranged between 8.4 × 106–120 × 106 sperm/mL and 65%, respectively. Finally, procedure times in the human studies, recorded for extracorporeal RAVVs and RAVEs ranged from 97 to 238 minutes.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted vasal reversal is feasible with similar patency rates as for the microsurgical approach and showing comparable outcomes. Additional benefits of this technique include improved vision and movement precision.

Cite this article as: Gözen AS, Tokas T, Tawfick A, Mousa W, Kotb M, Tzanaki E, et al. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Current status and review of the literature. Turk J Urol 2020; 46(5): 329-34.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research & Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 46 · Issue 5
Pages 329-334
History
Published Online August 31, 2020
Copyright
Affiliations
Ali Serdar Gözen
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Theodoros Tokas
Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T.,Hall in Tirol, Austria
Ahmed Tawfick
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Waleed Mousa
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Mohamed Kotb
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Eirini Tzanaki
University of Pavia, Medical School, Harvey Course, Pavia, Italy
Jens Rassweiler
Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Cite this Article
Outlines