GENERAL UROLOGY - Original Article

Double-face augmentation urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures: Analysis of short-term outcomes

Volume 46 · Issue 5 Publish Date: June 3, 2020
Full Text PDF
DOI
Bhavatej Enganti
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mannem Srinath Reddy
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mallikarjuna Chiruvella
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mohammed Taif Bendigeri
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Deepak Ragoori
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Syed Mohammed Ghouse
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Purnachandra Reddy
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: To present our initial experience with double-face augmentation urethroplasty for near-obliterative bulbar urethral strictures and analyze the short-term outcomes.

Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated a prospectively maintained database of patients with near-obliterative bulbar urethral strictures (>2 cm), who underwent double-face augmentation urethroplasty. The patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical data, and data regarding the investigations conducted were analyzed. Near-obliterative urethral stricture was defined as lumen <6 Fr. Double-face urethroplasty was performed using a ventral approach, during which dorsal inlay and ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation were performed. A successful outcome was defined as normal voiding without the need for any instrumentation to improve the urinary flow rate.

Results: A total of 37 patients with a mean age of 50±11.7 years, who underwent this procedure were included in the study. The mean stricture length was 5.2±0.95 cm. The mean length of the dorsal inlay BMG augmentation was 3.1±0.5 cm and that of the ventral onlay BMG augmentation was 6.3±1.2 cm. Post-void dribbling (18.9%) was the most commonly reported complication. The maximum flow rates and symptom scores significantly improved in both groups compared with the preoperative parameters (p<0.001). The incidence of both erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory failure was reported in 6 (16.2%) patients; respectively. The overall success rate was 86.5% at a median follow-up period of 36 months (IQR: 26.5–43).

Conclusion: Double-face augmentation urethroplasty is a safe and feasible option for near-obliterative bulbar urethral strictures, and our study showed satisfactory short-term outcomes for the same.

Cite this article as: Enganti B, Reddy MS, Chiruvella M, Bendigeri MT, Ragoori D, Ghouse SM, et al. Double-face augmentation urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures: Analysis of short-term outcomes. Turk J Urol 2020; 46(5): 383-7.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research & Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 46 · Issue 5
Pages 383-387
History
Published Online June 3, 2020
Copyright
Affiliations
Bhavatej Enganti
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mannem Srinath Reddy
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mallikarjuna Chiruvella
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Mohammed Taif Bendigeri
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Deepak Ragoori
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Syed Mohammed Ghouse
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Purnachandra Reddy
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India
Cite this Article
Outlines