GENERAL UROLOGY - Original Article

Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil

Volume 47 · Issue 4 Publish Date: July 1, 2021
Full Text PDF
DOI
Devashree P. Joshi
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Devang Desai
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Seichi Fuziwara
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Sheliyan Raveenthiran
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Mohammed Nafea
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Sanjay B. Kulkarni
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Joshi, D. P., Desai, D., Fuziwara, S., Raveenthiran, S., Nafea, M., & Kulkarni, S. B. (2021). Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil. Urology Research and Practice, 47(4), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21065
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: To define the role of tadalafil in improving outcomes of redo urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). PFUI is common in developing countries, invariably as a result of road traffic trauma. Repair is complex, and redo cases are even more challenging.

Material and methods: This was a longitudinal prospective nonrandomized study between 2017 and 2019. Men undergoing redo-urethroplasty were nonrandomized into two groups. Group 1 received tadalafil 5 mg the next day after surgery and continued for 3 months, and group 2 did not receive tadalafil. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing redo-urethroplasty willing to trial low-dose tadalafil post-operatively. Exclusion criteria were <18 years, females, primary cases, and complex cases such as recto-urethral fistula. Average follow-up was 19.5 months.

Results: Sixty patients were enrolled (29 in group 1 and 31 in group 2). Mean age was 31 years. These patients had 1-3 prior failed urethroplasties. Most required step 3 anastomotic urethroplasty (68.3%). Success was defined as absence of symptoms and no need for surgical intervention. Failure was defined as redo urethroplasty or >1 endoscopic intervention. Primary success was 83.3%. Success with tadalafil was 96.6%, compared to 71.0% in the non-Tadalafil group (P &frac14; .0008). Only one patient on tadalafil failed, compared with nine in the non-tadalafil group. Secondary success rate was defined as the need for a single subsequent endoscopic intervention and was 93.3%.

Conclusion: In our series, there was improved outcome with using tadalafil in patients having redo urethroplasty for PFUI. Further trials should be done to evaluate the use in all PFUI cases.

Cite this article as: Joshi PM, Desai D, Fuziwara S, Raveenthiran S, Nafea M, Kulkarni SB. Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil. Turk J Urol. 2021;47(4):319-324.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 47 · Issue 4
Pages 319-324
History
Published Online July 1, 2021
Copyright
Affiliations
Devashree P. Joshi
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Devang Desai
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Seichi Fuziwara
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Sheliyan Raveenthiran
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Mohammed Nafea
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Sanjay B. Kulkarni
Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India
Cite this Article
Joshi, D. P., Desai, D., Fuziwara, S., Raveenthiran, S., Nafea, M., & Kulkarni, S. B. (2021). Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil. Urology Research and Practice, 47(4), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21065
Outlines