NEUROUROLOGY - Original Article

Detrusor-Overactivity-Related Voiding in Women Mimics Bladder Outflow Obstruction and Conceals Underactivity

Volume 49 · Issue 4 Publish Date: July 1, 2023
Full Text PDF
DOI
Takeya Kitta
Department of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
Yui Abe-Takahashi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mifuka Ouchi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mayuko Tsukiyama
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Naohisa Kusakabe
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Madoka Higuchi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Hiroki Chiba
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mio Togo
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Shinya Kobayashi
Miyanosawa Nephro–Urology Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Nobuo Shinohara
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Urodynamics of the storage phase showing detrusor overactivity is com- mon in neurogenic bladder patients. Terminal detrusor overactivity, which is defined by involuntary detrusor contraction that cannot be inhibited, causes urinary incon- tinence. Such incontinence causes a unique voiding in neurogenic bladder patients. During the voiding phase, the detrusor pressure at Qmax (Pdet.Qmax)/maximum flow rate (Qmax) (P/Q) is the gold standard for differentiating between detrusor underactiv- ity and bladder outflow obstruction. We investigated whether a valid identification of lower urinary tract dysfunction could be established from P/Q assessment of detrusor overactivity-related voiding patients.

Methods: This study evaluated 2 types of voiding. Detrusor overactivity-related void- ing is involuntary detrusor contraction that results in micturition or voiding after per- mission to void when detrusor overactivity has occurred, while voluntary voiding is voiding voluntarily after permission to void and without terminal detrusor overactivity. We evaluated female patients with neurogenic bladder who could undergo micturition without catheterization. A pressure flow study compared the 2 groups.

Results: Comparison of the detrusor overactivity-related voiding group (n=20) and the voluntary voiding group (n=12) found statistically significant differences with a lower Qmax and higher Pdet.Qmax (P=.01) in the detrusor overactivity-related void- ing group. The linear regression analysis P/Q plot showed the positivity and negativity value of the slope that was reversed in the 2 groups (−0.089 vs. 0.198).

Conclusion: Current results showed different P/Q plot patterns between 2 types of voiding in patients with neurogenic bladder. These findings suggest there is increased detrusor pressure observed in detrusor overactivity-related voiding that mimics out- flow obstruction.

Cite this article as: Kitta T, Kobayashi S, Togo M, et al. Detrusor-overactivity-related voiding in women mimics bladder outflow obstruction and conceals underactivity. Urol Res Pract. 2023;49(4):266-270.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research & Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 49 · Issue 4
Pages 266-270
History
Published Online July 1, 2023
Copyright
Affiliations
Takeya Kitta
Department of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
Yui Abe-Takahashi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mifuka Ouchi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mayuko Tsukiyama
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Naohisa Kusakabe
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Madoka Higuchi
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Hiroki Chiba
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mio Togo
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Shinya Kobayashi
Miyanosawa Nephro–Urology Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Nobuo Shinohara
Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Cite this Article
Outlines