UROONCOLOGY - Original Article

Impact of Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Urinary Continence and Longitudinal Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Volume 52 Publish Date: August 19, 2026
Full Text PDF
DOI
Hisanori Taniguchi ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Junichi Ikeda ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Yuki Masuo ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Hidefumi Kinoshita ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Taniguchi, H., Ikeda, J., Masuo, Y., & Kinoshita, H. (2026). Impact of Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Urinary Continence and Longitudinal Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urology Research and Practice, 52, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.26026
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly administered before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in selected patients with localized prostate cancer, particularly those with high-risk disease. Despite its potential oncologic benefits, the association of neoadjuvant ADT with postoperative urinary function and health-related quality of life remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the association between neoadjuvant ADT and functional recovery following RARP.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent RARP between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and categorized based on neoadjuvant ADT status. Urinary continence (≤1 pad/d), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain score, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy— General score, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Prostate score were assessed longitudinally. Urinary continence recovery was analyzed using the Kaplan– Meier method, and longitudinal patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models.

Results: Among 327 eligible patients, 58 received neoadjuvant ADT. Urinary continence recovery was comparable between the groups (log-rank P = .251). Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain scores decreased immediately after surgery and improved over time (P for time <.001). Neoadjuvant ADT (P = .181) and the time-by-treatment interaction (P = .557) were not significantly associated with postoperative urinary function. Similarly, longitudinal Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Prostate scores were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant ADT is not associated with delayed urinary continence recovery or poorer health-related quality of life after RARP, supporting its use in appropriately selected patients without evidence of compromised postoperative functional recovery.

Cite this article as: Taniguchi H, Ikeda J, Masuo Y, Kinoshita H. Impact of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on urinary continence and longitudinal quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Res Pract. 2026;52, doi: 10.5152/tud.2026.26026

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 52
Pages 1-5
History
Published Online August 19, 2026
License
Affiliations
Hisanori Taniguchi ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Junichi Ikeda ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Yuki Masuo ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Hidefumi Kinoshita ORCID
Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Cite this Article
Taniguchi, H., Ikeda, J., Masuo, Y., & Kinoshita, H. (2026). Impact of Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Urinary Continence and Longitudinal Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urology Research and Practice, 52, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.26026
Outlines