ENDOUROLOGY - Original Article

Factors Associated with Spontaneous Passage of Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study

Volume 52 Publish Date: September 24, 2026
Full Text PDF
DOI
Mehmet Karadayı ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Ural Oğuz ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Ercan Öğreden ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Doğan Sabri Tok ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Özay Demiray ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University Giresun Training and Research Hospital, Giresun, Türkiye
Erhan Demirelli ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Karadayı, M., Oğuz, U., Öğreden, E., Tok, D. S., Demiray, Özay, & Demirelli, E. (2026). Factors Associated with Spontaneous Passage of Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study. Urology Research and Practice, 52, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.26023
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with spontaneous passage (SP) of ureteral stones.

Methods: The present prospective study included 113 patients with ureteral stones <1 cm, categorized into SP (n = 60) and non-spontaneous passage (NSP; n = 53) groups. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, and stone-related factors were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent factors associated with spontaneous stone passage.

Results: The median stone size (5.5 mm [interquartile range [IQR] 3.1] vs 7 mm [IQR 3.0]; P = .001) and stone burden (20.5 mm2 [IQR 29.25] vs 36 mm2 [IQR 24.25]; P = .01) were significantly lower in the SP group. The mean Hounsfield unit (HU) of the stones was 738 ± 38 HU in the SP group and 884 ± 37 HU in the NSP group (P = .007). Fifty-six patients (93.3%) had soft stones in the SP group, and 36 (67.9%) patients had soft stones in the NSP group (P = 0.001). A lower C-reactive protein (CRP) level was statistically associated with SP (26.7% vs 50.9%; P = .007). Hematuria was also associated with SP (80% vs 62.3%; P = .041). In multivariable analysis, stone size remained independently associated with SP (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63 per 1-mm increase; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.88; P = .007).

Conclusion: Stone composition was not associated with ureteral spontaneous stone passage. Although stone size remained independently associated with SP after adjustment for other relevant variables, stone burden, HU and hardness of the stone, hematuria, and serum CRP level were associated with spontaneous stone passage in univariable analysis. These parameters should be considered when selecting patients for active surveillance of SP.

Cite this article as: Karadayı M, Oğuz U, Öğreden E, et al. Factors associated with spontaneous passage of ureteral stones: A prospective clinical study. Urol Res Pract. 2026;52, doi:10.5152/tud.2026.26023

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Urology Research and Practice
Volume / Issue Volume 52
Pages 1-7
History
Published Online September 24, 2026
License
Affiliations
Mehmet Karadayı ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Ural Oğuz ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Ercan Öğreden ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Doğan Sabri Tok ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Özay Demiray ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University Giresun Training and Research Hospital, Giresun, Türkiye
Erhan Demirelli ORCID
Department of Urology, Giresun University School of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye
Cite this Article
Karadayı, M., Oğuz, U., Öğreden, E., Tok, D. S., Demiray, Özay, & Demirelli, E. (2026). Factors Associated with Spontaneous Passage of Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study. Urology Research and Practice, 52, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2026.26023
Outlines